Learning journey · stage 2

Why does everything fall alike?

Without air, a feather and a hammer fall equally fast. But why? Einstein’s answer turned our picture of gravity upside down. Three stations: at each one you commit to an answer first, then check it in the experiment.

Station 1 of 3

The windowless lift

In 1907 Einstein was still working at the patent office in Bern when it struck him: someone in free fall does not feel their own weight. He later called this his “happiest thought”. It grew into a thought experiment with two cabins without windows.

The stations need JavaScript. The experiments themselves are also in the chapter General relativity.

Interactive · equivalence principle

Two cabins, one result

Windows closed: from inside, both cabins look the same.

Greatly exaggerated: in a cabin 2 m wide, at 1 g the beam drops only about 2 × 10−16 m, because light needs just some 7 billionths of a second to cross it.

Station 2 of 3

The rubber sheet and Mercury

By 1915 Einstein’s answer was complete: mass curves spacetime, and bodies follow that curvature. The best-known picture of this is a rubber sheet with a heavy ball. The theory passed its first big test on a tiny puzzle in Mercury’s orbit.

The stations need JavaScript. The experiments themselves are also in the chapter General relativity.

Interactive · spacetime as a rubber sheet

The dent in the sheet

Set the mass and launch the test ball.

The test ball moves according to Newton's law of gravitation; the depth of the dent is drawn for illustration only. Click or tap to put the heavy ball somewhere else.

What the rubber sheet doesn’t tell you

1 · It explains gravity with gravity

The heavy ball only presses the dent in because the Earth pulls it down, and the small ball only rolls in for the same reason. Take the Earth away from under the sheet and see what is left of the model.

2 · What really pulls: curved time

In Einstein’s theory, clocks close to a mass run more slowly. On Earth the effect is tiny: a clock one metre higher runs faster by 1.1 × 10−16, about 3.4 billionths of a second per year. In 2010, atomic clocks measured it for a height difference of just 33 centimetres.

ground 50 m 100 m

Animation: 100 m of height, the difference in rate exaggerated about five trillion times.

So over 80 years the head of a person 1.70 m tall ages about half a millionth of a second more than their feet.

3 · The path through spacetime

Throw a ball straight up: after 2 seconds it is back down. In a picture of height against time its path is an arch. According to Einstein, a body flying freely between throw and landing takes the path on which its own clock shows the most time. Clocks run faster higher up, so it pays to fly upward. But going too high means flying faster, and fast clocks run slower. Try out different arches.

0510 012 height (m) time (s) lying still
+2.32 · 10−16 s
extra time on the ball’s clock compared with lying still on the ground

Too low: going a little higher would gain the clock more than the faster flight costs.

For slow bodies – balls, planets, you – gravity comes almost entirely from curved time. The curvature of space, which the sheet shows, is much weaker for them – it only shows up in subtle effects such as Mercury’s 43″. Light, however, feels both in equal parts. That is why Einstein’s deflection of light (1.75″) is twice Newton’s (0.87″).

For the curious: the calculation
  • Rate difference of two clocks whose heights differ by h: Δf/f ≈ g·h/c² = 9.81 m/s² · 1 m / (2.998 · 108 m/s)² ≈ 1.09 · 10−16; over a year (3.16 · 107 s) that is 3.4 · 10−9 s.
  • Time on a clock along a path h(t), for slow motion in a weak field: τ ≈ ∫ (1 + g·h/c² − v²/(2c²)) dt.
  • For arches h(t) = k·t·(T − t) with T = 2 s, the gain over lying still is Δτ = T³/6 · (g·k − k²)/c². It is largest for k = g/2: exactly a throw that falls with g, peak height g·T²/8 = 4.9 m, gain 3.6 · 10−16 s.
  • Light deflection: the warping of time alone gives 0.87″, the warping of space adds the same amount again, 1.75″ in total.
Sources:
  1. NIST (2010): aluminium atomic clocks show the effect for a height difference of 33 cm; Chou et al., “Optical Clocks and Relativity”, Science 329, 1630–1633 (2010).
  2. Wikipedia: Gravitational time dilation.
  3. Carroll, Lecture Notes on General Relativity, arXiv:gr-qc/9712019: only the time part of the geometry matters for slow bodies (Newtonian limit, ch. 4).
  4. Wikipedia: Geodesics in general relativity: a free-fall path is the one with the longest proper time between nearby paths; Taylor & Wheeler, Exploring Black Holes (2000): principle of maximal aging.
  5. Will, “The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment”, Living Rev. Relativ. 17, 4 (2014), arXiv:1403.7377: light deflection (1 + γ)/2 · 1.75″, γ measures the curvature of space.
  6. Own calculation of the clock rates and of the arch; see “For the curious”.

Interactive · Mercury's perihelion

The ellipse that turns

0″
left over that Newton cannot explain
42.98″
per century: Einstein's share

Observed turning: about 575″ per century

532″ pull of the other planets (Newton)43″ Einstein

Greatly exaggerated: the ellipse is drawn far more elongated than Mercury's real orbit, and the turning is magnified 25 times. The 532″ caused by the planets are subtracted; what you see is only the remaining 43″ per century. The dot does not move at its real pace.

Station 3 of 3

The solar eclipse of 1919

If gravity deflects light, starlight grazing past the Sun must be bent slightly. Such stars can only be seen when the Moon covers the Sun. For the total solar eclipse of 29 May 1919, the British astronomers Frank Dyson and Arthur Eddington sent out two expeditions: to the island of Príncipe off West Africa and to Sobral in Brazil.

The stations need JavaScript. The experiments themselves are also in the chapter General relativity.

Interactive · solar eclipse of 1919

Stars at the edge of the Sun

Einstein: 1.75″ at the Sun's edge, half as much at twice the distance.

Unmagnified (×1) the shift is invisible: 1.75″ is roughly a thousandth of the Sun's diameter. The star field is schematic, loosely based on the Hyades, not true to position. Light-blue rings: where the stars would be without the Sun.

Measured in 1919: deflection at the Sun's edge

Newton 0.87″ Einstein 1.75″
  • Sobral, 4-inch lens: 1.98″ ± 0.18″
  • Príncipe: 1.61″ ± 0.30″
  • Sobral, main telescope (discarded in 1919): 0.93″
  • Re-measured in 1979: Sobral, 4-inch lens: 1.90″ ± 0.11″
  • Re-measured in 1979: Sobral, main telescope: 1.55″ ± 0.34″

Values and error bars after Crispino & Kennefick (2019); for the Sobral main telescope the 1919 report gives no reliable error.

Photographic plate of the total solar eclipse of 29 May 1919
A photographic plate of the 1919 eclipse. The stars near the covered Sun appeared shifted slightly outwards.Image: F. W. Dyson, A. S. Eddington & C. Davidson. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons (Source)